WHAT ABOUT THOSE WHO HAVE NEVER HEARD THE GOOD NEWS?
But what about people living in remote regions, isolated tribes, or communities with no exposure to Christianity—those who have never even heard the name of Jesus? Does that mean there is no salvation for them?
Two major theological perspectives address this question: Inclusivism and Exclusivism. The key difference is that Exclusivism maintains that a person must place conscious faith in Jesus Christ in order to be saved, while Inclusivism allows for the possibility that God’s grace can reach those who have not heard the gospel in explicit terms.
ON THE SIDE OF INCLUSIVISM
According to this position, God judges people on the basis of the information that they have. Therefore, if a person has never heard about Christ, God will not condemn them for failing to believe in the gospel; to do so would be unjust. Inclusivists often cite Romans 1 and 2 as their foundation. All people receive general revelation from God through creation (Rom 1:18–20) and through the moral law written on their hearts—their conscience (Rom 2:15). For this reason, even those who have never heard the gospel are said to be “without excuse” (Rom 1:20).
According to inclusivists, this general revelation is sufficient for a person to recognize their need for salvation and to respond in faith, even without explicit knowledge of Jesus. They point to those saved in Old Testament times as examples. They had the form of the gospel without its full content and yet they were saved. Inclusivism does not claim salvation apart from Christ, but it argues that “the benefits of Christ’s death could be applied to someone without his conscious knowledge of Christ” (Craig)—still by grace through faith.
ON THE SIDE OF EXCLUSIVISM
Exclusivists maintain that understanding and believing the gospel is absolutely necessary for salvation. They hold that it is impossible for anyone who has never heard of Jesus to be saved, because Christ Himself declared that people must believe in Him, and “there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
Exclusivists argue that the general revelation of creation and conscience is never enough to save, though it is sufficient to condemn. They see this as Paul’s point in Romans 1 and 2: “Humans aren’t guilty because they haven’t heard the gospel; they’re guilty because they haven’t honored their Creator. In other words, not because of the absence of something (faith), but because of the presence of something (rebellion)” (Smethurst, 2007). Thus, God remains just in punishing those who have never heard of Christ.
Furthermore, they contend that if people could be saved without knowing Jesus, evangelism would lose its urgency. Romans 10:13–17 is a key text: “And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard?” (v. 14). The story of Cornelius in Acts 10 is often cited: if Cornelius could have been saved without the gospel, God would not have sent Peter to preach to him.
WHAT ABOUT THOSE WHO HAVE NEVER HEARD THE GOOD NEWS?
1. DOES IT MEAN THAT ONLY THOSE WHO CONSCIOUSLY REJECT THE GOSPEL WILL GO TO HELL?
No. Anyone who rejects God’s offer of salvation—whether through general revelation in creation and conscience or through special revelation—will face judgment. Preaching the Gospel is always the primary and normative way a person can believe and be saved. That is why Paul emphasizes in Romans 10:14, “How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching?” This also explains why God sent Peter to the house of Cornelius (Acts 10). If preaching is possible, God will use it. But special revelation is not limited to preaching. The situation of unreached people today is similar to those who lived during the Old Testament era or in the early New Testament period before the Gospel spread widely. Anyone who fails to respond positively to whatever means God chooses to offer salvation remains guilty before Him.
2. DOES IT MEAN THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO BE SAVED APART FROM JESUS?
No. The fact that someone might be saved without conscious knowledge of Jesus does not mean there is salvation apart from Him. Christ’s finished work has always been—and will always be—the sole basis of salvation. Those who lived before Christ and offered sacrifices under the Law were forgiven only because of Christ’s future atonement (Hebrews 10:4, 14), even though they did not yet know Him. The unevangelized may also be given the opportunity to be saved, though the means may differ. Remember that Melchizedek was a believer in a pagan context (Genesis 14:18). Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, appears to have been a believer (Exodus 18). Even Balaam, a pagan diviner, encountered the true God (Numbers 22). God is indeed near to all people (Acts 17:27). Salvation is always by grace through faith—there is no other way and no other Gospel. This universal truth applies to every person, everywhere, at any time.
3. WHY EVANGELIZE IF GENERAL AND SPECIAL REVELATION CAN SAVE?
Because God commands it (Mark 16:15). “The gospel…is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes” (Romans 1:16). The appointed time has come when the preaching of the Gospel is God’s primary means of calling people to repentance (Mark 1:15). As Paul declared, “but now he commands all people everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30). Evangelism has always been an urgent mission. This task was not given to angels but only entrusted to believers. God’s sovereign ability to reach the most isolated does not excuse us from our responsibility. We must share Paul’s passion: “Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel!” (1 Corinthians 9:16).
4. WHAT ABOUT PASSAGES THAT SEEM TO REQUIRE KNOWING JESUS TO BE SAVED?
Consider two commonly cited texts:
John 3:18. Jesus says, “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.” At first glance, this may appear to rule out salvation for those who never hear of Jesus. But in context, Jesus is speaking to those confronted with His message who still refuse to believe (see verse 11: “still you people do not accept our testimony”). This is about people who have the opportunity to hear and deliberately reject Him. It does not apply to Abraham, Moses, or anyone else who never had the chance to know Christ during their lifetime. Those who have heard the Gospel and reject it are held to greater accountability than those who never hear (Matthew 11:20-24).
Romans 10:17. Paul writes, “So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.” Some conclude from this that only the preached Gospel can bring saving faith. But the context argues otherwise. Just one verse earlier (v. 16), Paul equates rejection of Isaiah’s prophecy—a form of special revelation—with rejection of the Gospel (cf. Isaiah 53:1-3). In v. 18 he even applies the universal testimony of creation from Psalm 19:3-4 to the message of Christ. Paul’s point is that God reaches all people through every means He chooses. Many reject Him, but He is still found by others (vv. 16, 20-21).
These passages underscore that conscious rejection brings judgment, but they do not exclude God’s gracious work to save those who have never had the chance to hear the name of Jesus. Stay Curious.
Comments
Post a Comment